Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Babcock v. Reyes et al
as 5:2024cv05026
Petitioner:
Kevin Babcock
Respondent:
Alejandro Reyes and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yexley v. Reyes et al
as 1:2024cv01010
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Wade Yexley
Respondent:
Alejandro Reyes and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Two Bulls v. Fluke et al
as 4:2024cv04046
Petitioner:
Thomas Earl Two Bulls
Respondent:
Brent Fluke and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3669
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Babcock v. Fluke et al
as 5:2023cv05076
Petitioner:
Kevin Babcock
Respondent:
Brent Fluke and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jerry Craig, Sr. v. State of South Dakota, et al
as 23-3186
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jerry Lee Craig, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
State of South Dakota, In service of the people, official capacity, Marty Jackley, Attorney General, Official Capacity and Brent Fluke, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04182
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pretty Sounding Flute v. Fluke et al
as 3:2023cv03026
Petitioner:
Jacob Pretty Sounding Flute
Respondent:
Brent Fluke and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graf v. Fluke et al
as 4:2023cv04173
Petitioner:
Nicholas Daniel Graf
Respondent:
Warden Brent Fluke and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Redshirt v. Fluke et al
as 5:2023cv05063
Petitioner:
Raymond John Redshirt
Respondent:
Warden Brent Fluke and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
