Cases 1 - 7 of 7
KOUNTZ et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as 2:2009cv92142
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. KOUNTZ, JR. and MARY KOUNTZ
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES CO., INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
KOUNTZ et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as 2:2009cv92141
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. KOUNTZ, JR. and MARY KOUNTZ
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES CO., INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
KOUNTZ et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as 2:2009cv92143
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. KOUNTZ, JR. and MARY KOUNTZ
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES CO., INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
KOUNTZ et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as 2:2009cv92140
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. KOUNTZ, JR. and MARY KOUNTZ
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES CO., INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
KOUNTZ et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as 2:2009cv92139
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. KOUNTZ, JR. and MARY KOUNTZ
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES CO., INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Edward Kountze v. Tyler Gaines, et al
as 07-2535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Edward H. Kountze, in his capacity as Trustee and on behalf of the Gilbert M. and Martha H.Hitchcock Foundation, a Nebraska Nonprofit Organization
Defendant - Appellee:
Tyler B. Gaines, Neely Kountze, Mary Kountze and others
Kountze v. Gaines, et al
as 8:2007cv00015
Plaintiff:
Edward H. Kountze, Edward H. Kountze, Edward H. Kountze and others
Defendant:
Tyler B. Gaines, Tyler B. Gaines, Tyler B. Gaines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.