Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05193
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
RANDOLPH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00846
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff: MARY MARGARET RANDOLPH
DAGAN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv65420
Plaintiff: ROBERT FRANK DAGAN and MARY MARGARET DAGAN
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLLAZO et al v. KEENE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv60464
Plaintiff: FRANK COLLAZO, JR. and MARY MARGARET COLLAZO
Defendant: KEENE CORPORATION , NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY , NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YANCEY et al v. A C & S, INC et al
as 2:2011cv62268
Plaintiff: WILLIE V YANCEY and MARY MARGARET YANCEY
Defendant: A C & S, INC , CELOTEX CORP , EAGLE-PICHER IND., INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PERCY v. UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv91319
Plaintiff: MARY MARGARET PERCY and MARY MARGARET PERCY
Defendant: UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANY, UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANY, NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
BALDWIN et al v. ACANDS, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2007cv64482
Plaintiff: ROBERT LEE BALDWIN, ROBERT LEE BALDWIN, LILLIE M. BALDWIN and others
Defendant: ACANDS, INCORPORATED, AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GRADEN v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION
as 2:2007cv61664
Plaintiff: MARY MARGARET GRADEN and MARY MARGARET GRADEN
Defendant: PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?