Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Miles v. Hall et al
as 1:2023cv03221
Plaintiff:
Kelvin J. Miles
Defendant:
Frank Hall, Maryland Parole Commission and Richard L. Lonhom Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Maryland Parole Commission et al
as 1:2023cv00762
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Walker
Defendant:
Maryland Parole Commission and Mr. Neverdon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cowan v. Miller et al
as 1:2022cv02863
Plaintiff:
Jerry Cowan
Defendant:
Commissioner Jane Miller and The Maryland Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01876
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Blankumee v. Blumberg et al
as 1:2022cv01020
Plaintiff:
Azaniah Blankumee
Defendant:
David R. Blumberg and Maryland Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Maryland Parole Commission et al
as 1:2021cv03164
Plaintiff:
Vander Davis
Defendant:
Maryland Parole Commission, Parole Officer Mya Collins, Parole Officer David Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Harris v. Ross et al
as 1:2021cv01983
Plaintiff:
Leobard Harris and Leonard Harris
Defendant:
Nikita Ross, Warden JCI and Maryland Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Hill v. Maryland Parole Commission
as 1:2020cv03609
Defendant:
Maryland Parole Commission
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hornberger v. Maryland Parole Commission et al
as 8:2020cv00786
Defendant:
Maryland Parole Commission and Maryland Division Of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Hornberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01359
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
