Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Baker v. Match Group Inc et al
as 3:2023cv02761
Plaintiff:
Marcus Baker
Defendant:
Match Group Inc, Match Group LLC, Hinge Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Street Spirit IP LLC v. Match Group Inc
as 3:2023cv01304
Plaintiff:
Street Spirit IP LLC
Defendant:
Match Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Street Spirit IP, LLC v. Match Group, Inc.
as 6:2022cv01001
Plaintiff:
Street Spirit IP, LLC
Defendant:
Match Group, Inc. doing business as OKCupid.com doing business as Tinder.com and Match Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Woodards v. Apple et al
as 4:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
Tre'von A Woodards
Defendant:
Apple, Bandlab Technologies, Activision Blizzard Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Crutchfield v. Match Group Inc et al
as 3:2019cv02356
Defendant:
Gary Swidler, Match Group, Inc. and Amanda W. Ginsberg
Plaintiff:
Phillip R. Crutchfield
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Federal Trade Commission v. Match Group Inc
as 3:2019cv02281
Defendant:
Match Group Inc, Match Group LLC and Match.com LLC
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
NETSOC, LLC v. MATCH GROUP, INC.
as 2:2018cv00217
Plaintiff:
NETSOC, LLC
Defendant:
MATCH GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
Chan v. Match Group Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00668
Defendant:
Match Group Inc, Gary Swidler, Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Chan and Stephany Kam-Wan Chan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
McCloskey et al v. Match Group Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00549
Defendant:
Match Group Inc, Gary Swidler, PNC Capital Markets LLC and others
Plaintiff:
McCloskey, Mary McCloskey, Craig Kneller and others
Petitioner:
Adam Marigliano, Liwei Sun, Shen Shen and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Stephany Kam-Wan Chan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
