Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Reid (PS) v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2024cv01114
Petitioner:
Richard Reid
Respondent:
A. Ciolli, English, A. Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hamrick (PS) v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Rodney Curtis Hamrick
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Andre Matevousian, Barb Von Blanckensee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Ciolli
as 1:2023cv02539
Plaintiff:
David E. Hill
Defendant:
A. Ciolli, Andre Matevousian and Timothy Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford (PS) v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv01878
Plaintiff:
Glendon Scott Crawford
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamrick v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv01098
Petitioner:
Rodney Curtis Hamrick and Rodney C. Hamrick
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Ian Connors, Andre Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shabazz v. Tuttoilmondo et al
as 1:2022cv01249
Plaintiff:
Sabir Shabazz
Defendant:
A. Tuttoilmondo, L. Adams, B. True and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowland v. Matevousian
as 1:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Dustin Alan Rowland
Defendant:
Andre Matevousian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nellson v. Matevousian et al
as 1:2021cv02710
Plaintiff:
Edward Nellson
Defendant:
Andre Matevousian, Bayer, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nellson v. Matevousian et al
as 1:2021cv02668
Plaintiff:
Edward Nellson
Defendant:
Andre Matevousian, PA Bayer, PA Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
York v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The et al
as 1:2021cv01503
Defendant:
J. Fox, Chris Synsvoll, SIS Tech Kerri Lewis-Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Dwight D. York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
