Cases 11 - 20 of 89
Mathis v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2022cv00225
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Mathis
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bongiovanni et al v. Austin et al
as 3:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Brittany Bongiovanni, Jessica Caldwell, Erin Davis and others
Defendant:
Lloyd Austin, III, Frank Kendall, Karl Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilliam v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2021cv02926
Petitioner:
Shawn Mathis Gilliam
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mathis v. Warden, FCC Coleman, USP I
as 5:2021cv00157
Petitioner:
Russell Todd Mathis
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mathis v. The City of Lakeland et al
as 8:2021cv00235
Defendant:
William Mutz, Matthew Vaughn, Bill and others
Plaintiff:
Howard A. Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2020cv00605
Petitioner:
Russell Todd Mathis
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez-Bonilla v. Perez et al
as 6:2020cv02235
Defendant:
Jacob Mathis, Michael Perez, City of West Melbourne, Florida and others
Plaintiff:
Margarita Rodriguez-Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2020mc00092
Defendant:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00528
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
