Cases 1 - 9 of 9
5E Boron Americas, LLC v. Matrix Service Inc.
as 5:2023cv01396
Plaintiff:
5E Boron Americas, LLC
Defendant:
Matrix Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CADS Construction, LLC v. Matrix Service, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00513
Plaintiff:
CADS Construction, LLC
Defendant:
Matrix Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MMR Constructors, Inc. v. Matrix Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00338
Petitioner:
MMR Constructors, Inc.
Respondent:
Matrix Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Keyera Energy, Inc. and Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MMR Constructors, Inc. v. Matrix Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00442
Respondent:
Keyera Energy, Inc., Matrix Services, Inc. and Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland
Petitioner:
MMR Constructors Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MMR Constructors, Inc. v. Matrix Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00173
Defendant:
Matrix Services, Inc., Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland and Keyera Energy, Inc.
Plaintiff:
MMR Constructors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
C A D S Construction L L C v. Matrix Service Inc
as 2:2021cv00099
Not Classified By Court:
CADS Construction, LLC
Defendant:
Matrix Service, Inc. and Matrix Service Inc
Plaintiff:
C A D S Construction L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Matrix Service Inc. v. International-Matex Tank Terminals, Ltd.
as 2:2013cv06264
Plaintiff:
Matrix Service Inc.
Defendant:
International-Matex Tank Terminals, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sulphuric Acid Trading Company, Inc. v. Matrix Service, Inc.
as 8:2012cv00959
Plaintiff:
Sulphuric Acid Trading Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Matrix Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kinder Morgan Liquids Terminals LLC v. Matrix Service Inc
as 4:2008cv02347
Plaintiff:
Kinder Morgan Liquids Terminals LLC
Defendant:
Matrix Service Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
