Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Smith v. Thomson United States Penitentiary(F.B.O.P.) et al
as 3:2023cv50402
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michael Smith
Defendant:
Thomson United States Penitentiary(F.B.O.P.), Warden Gonzalis, G.E.O. Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Gonzalis et al
as 3:2023cv50226
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michael Smith
Defendant:
Gonzalis, Hess, GEO Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Menard Correctional Center et al
as 3:2021cv00567
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe 1, John/Jane Doe 2 and Menard Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Twaddell
as 3:2016cv03211
Plaintiff:
Matthew J Smith
Defendant:
William Twaddell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv03119
Plaintiff:
Matthew J Smith
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Pontiac Correctional Center, Randy Pfister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cox et al
as 3:2012cv00650
Plaintiff:
Matthew L Smith
Defendant:
John Cox, Glenn Howard, Pat Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Scrogum et al
as 1:2012cv01063
Plaintiff:
Matthew J Smith
Defendant:
. Scrogum, . Brown, . Kochel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Webber et al
as 1:2011cv01338
Plaintiff:
Matthew J Smith
Defendant:
Karl A Webber and Hastings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Illinois Dept. of Justice et al
as 1:2009cv01203
Petitioner:
Matthew J. Smith
Respondent:
Illinois Dept. of Justice and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Defendant:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Illinois Department of Juvenile Justice
as 1:2009cv01206
Plaintiff:
Matthew J Smith
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Juvenile Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
