Cases 41 - 50 of 127
Chen v. Barr
as 19-221
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Guang Yao Chen
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00407
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Kabudi v. Barr
as 19-169
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Fernando Kabudi
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv06154
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas v. Barr
as 19-303
Petitioner:
Harvel Thomas, AKA Terrell A. Cooley, AKA Edward J. Hogan, AKA Flu Fnu, AKA Nayquan James Nicholas, AKA Harvel Azan Thomas, AKA Edward James Hogan
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, Acting United States Attorney General
Abregon-Hernandez v. Barr
as 19-173
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Rudi Abregon-Hernandez, AKA Rudy Abrego
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00184
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Caba Binet v. Barr
as 19-258
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Hector Lenny Caba Binet, AKA Hector Lenny Caba
Chen v. Barr
as 19-10
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Xiaocui Chen
Graham v. Barr
as 19-223
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Kimanie Tavoy Graham
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
