Cases 1 - 10 of 21
SHERVEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU INVESTIGATION
as 1:2023cv03923
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J. SHERVEN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
SHERVEN v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
as 1:2023cv03534
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J. SHERVEN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHERVEN v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
as 1:2023cv03345
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J. SHERVEN
Defendant:
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
SHERVEN v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2023cv03214
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J. SHERVEN
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
SHERVEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02977
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J. SHERVEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
SHERVEN v. DICK DIDDLER AND THE ASSHOLE TICKLERS
as 1:2023cv02970
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J. SHERVEN
Defendant:
DICK DIDDLER AND THE ASSHOLE TICKLERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Sherven, Matthew v. U.S. Secret Service
as 3:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Sherven
Defendant:
U.S. Secret Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Sherven, Matthew v. National Security Agency
as 3:2023cv00603
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Sherven
Defendant:
National Security Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Matthew Sherven v. USA, et al
as 23-5174
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew J. Sherven
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Central Intelligence Agency, William Burns, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency and others
Sherven, Matthew v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 3:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Sherven
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
