Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Johnson v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, d/b/a Amtrak
as 1:2021cv05324
Plaintiff:
Saint Matthew Johnson
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK), BNSF Railway Company and National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Hoskins v. Bartolotti et al
as 3:2021cv00693
Defendant:
C/O Swisher, Lieutenant Miller, C/O Hagston and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Bartolotti et al
as 3:2021cv00683
Defendant:
R. Oleary, Chad Adams, C/O Summers and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Bartolotti et al
as 3:2021cv00664
Defendant:
C. Heck, Mr. Adams, Mr. Spiller and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Chapman et al
as 3:2021cv00620
Defendant:
C. Heck, Treg Vanderkhove, Mark A. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Johnson et al
as 3:2021cv00442
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Defendant:
Matthew Johnson and Daniel J. Harriss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Mumbower et al
as 3:2020cv01377
Defendant:
Officer Hankins, T. Vandekerkhove, Officer Tomshack and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv03150
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, SIU ENT, John Does and Jane Does Medical Dental and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Thamrong et al
as 1:2019cv05671
Defendant:
MD Ponni Arunkumar and MD Thamrong Chira
Plaintiff:
Matthew Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hankins v. Beck et al
as 3:2018cv03277
Defendant:
Vivian Brown, Kate Daniels, Sangamon County Jail Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Terrell Hankins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
