Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Harter v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv01249
Plaintiff:
Matthew L. Harter
Defendant:
Dean Williams, Matthew Winden and Clinton Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gantt v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gantt
Defendant:
James Johnson, Larry Winegardner, Thomas Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza v. Winden
as 1:2023cv00938
Petitioner:
Albert R. Garza
Respondent:
Matthew Winden and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kness v. Winden
as 1:2023cv00041
Petitioner:
Travis John Kness
Respondent:
Winden, Matthew Winden and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Brady et al
as 1:2022cv03216
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Judge Jill Brady, Jessica Aggson, David Chapin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. McGrath et al
as 1:2022cv03019
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Merideth McGrath, Matthew Winden, Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodring v. Winden et al
as 1:2022cv03174
Petitioner:
Lee Eldon Woodring
Respondent:
Matthew Winden and Attorney General State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. McGrath et al
as 1:2022cv03042
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Defendant:
Merideth McGrath, Matthew Winden, Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harter v. Polis et al
as 1:2022cv02266
Plaintiff:
Matthew L. Harter
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Dean Williams and Matthew Winden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
