Cases 1 - 10 of 631
Tunstall v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00495
Petitioner:
Matthew Nelson Tunstall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Matthews v. Federal Medical Center Warden
as 4:2024cv00405
Petitioner:
Eric Martin Matthews
Respondent:
Federal Medical Center Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Zimmerman v. Thomas et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ivan Zimmerman
Defendant:
Sheriff Bryan Thomas, Chaplain Richard Ashford, Chief FNU Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01387
Petitioner:
Matthew Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kenney et al v. Dallas County Texas
as 3:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kenney and Gregory Benedict
Defendant:
Dallas County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Bolin et al
as 1:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Reginald Evans
Defendant:
Operations Manager Nina Bolin, Operations Manager Linda M Pettillo, Linda Stacy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. USA
as 4:2024cv00277
Petitioner:
David Matthews
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Evans v. Bolin et al
as 6:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Reginald Evans
Defendant:
Operations Manager Nina Bolin, Operations Manager Linda M Pettillo, Operations Manager Linda Stacy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00804
Petitioner:
Matthew Thomas Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zimmerman v. Potter County Detention Center
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ivan Zimmerman
Defendant:
Potter County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
