Cases 31 - 40 of 466
Kirkman v. Mason County Detention Center et al
as 2:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Matthew Joseph Kirkman
Defendant:
Mason County Detention Center and Gerald Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. USA
as 5:2023cv00129
Petitioner:
Katherine E. Matthews
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Kirkman v. Mason County Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Matthew Joseph Kirkman
Defendant:
Mason County Detention Center and Lt. Gerald Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Patton v. Miller et al
as 3:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Matthew Patton
Defendant:
Donald Miller and David Heacock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Aliff et al v. Mayfield Consumer Products, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Dustin Aliff, Roberta Brooks, Jeff Chism and others
Defendant:
Mayfield Consumer Products, LLC, Justin Bobbitt and Lorenzo H. Cash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Leave Act
Otterson v. Richards
as 1:2022cv00171
Petitioner:
Derek Matthew Otterson
Defendant:
Jamie Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
