Cases 31 - 40 of 3,852
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ballard v. County of Rockland et al
as 7:2024cv02944
Plaintiff:
Wayne Ballard
Defendant:
County of Rockland, Thomas E. Walsh, II, Peter Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Marozzi v. Interlicchia et al
as 6:2024cv06223
Plaintiff:
Quentin A. Marozzi
Defendant:
Nicholas Interlicchia, Matthew Daminski, L. Strapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gattuso v. Hamilton et al
as 1:2024cv02880
Plaintiff:
Matthew Anthony Gattuso
Defendant:
Booz Allen Hamilton and Jason Dusterwald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Moss et al v. Jovia Financial Federal Credit Union
as 2:2024cv02797
Plaintiff:
Matthew Moss, Kristine Jamgotchian and Shannon Poblete
Defendant:
Jovia Financial Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
