Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Sherbrooke Corporate, Ltd et al v. Mayer et al
as 5:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Samuel Sherbrooke Corporate, Ltd and Samuel Goldner
Defendant:
Gabriel Mayer, Beau Walker, Joseph Matthew Queen and others
WARREN v. KING et al
as 1:2023cv00990
Plaintiff:
TINIKA SECAL WARREN
Defendant:
MATTHEW KING, HUD OFFICE GREENSBORO and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bhavsar v. Potere et al
as 3:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Denish Bhavsar and Spartan Acquisition Corp. II
Defendant:
Matthew Potere, Barry Edinburg, Rodney Yoder and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. DH-C601 LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
DH-C601 LLC doing business as Clutch Kitchen & Pour House, Domenico D. Marsocci and Matthew F. Porillo
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Robbins et al v. Altopa, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00482
Plaintiff:
Lance Jay Robbins, The Robbins Marital Settlement Trust of 1994, MII Realty LLC and others
Defendant:
Altopa, Inc., Matthew Wilson and Nicole K. Wicker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
