Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
David Getzen v. J. Barby, et al
as 20-17243
Defendant / Appellee: J. MATTOX, A. RUSSELL, CAROL KENNEDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID GETZEN
David Getzen v. County of Yavapai, et al
as 20-17244
Defendant / Appellee: M. PERRY, MICHAEL BLUFF, Yavapai Judge, JARAMILLO, Sgt. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID GETZEN
David Getzen v. County of Yavapai, et al
as 20-17242
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL BLUFF, Yavapai Judge, JANE NICOLETT JONES, STOVER, Deputy, Yavapai County Sheriff's Office (YCSO) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID GETZEN
Claude Mattox, Jr. v. Craig Koenig
as 20-55985
Respondent / Appellee: CRAIG KOENIG, Acting Warden
Petitioner / Appellant: CLAUDE DAVE MATTOX, Jr.
Otis Thomas v. Michael Mattox, et al
as 17-56916
Plaintiff - Appellant: OTIS MICHAEL THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL MATTOX, Sgt.; No. 3373, in official capacity, JUSTIN EISENBERG, Captain, in official capacity, MARTIN BLAND, Senior Management Analyst, Official Capacity and others
Kevin Almy v. Minor Adams, et al
as 16-17289
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEVIN ALMY
Defendant - Appellee: MINOR ADAMS, DR. ARANAS, R. BAKER and others
Kevin Almy v. Minor Adams, et al
as 16-17286
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEVIN ALMY
Defendant - Appellee: MINOR ADAMS, DR. ARANAS, R. BAKER and others
USA v. Toulon Mattox
as 14-30009
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: TOULON K. MATTOX
Jose Parra Ascencio v. Robert Hernandez, et al
as 13-56939
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSE LUIS PARRA ASCENCIO
Defendant - Appellee: ROBERT HERNANDEZ, Warden at Donovan State Prison, ROSITAS, Counselor at Donovan State Prison, JOE DOE, Correctional Sergeant in R&R and others
John Mattox v. Castrol, et al
as 13-15986
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN MATTOX
Defendant - Appellee: CASTROL, Sgt., E. MARTINEZ, MARQUEZ, Lt. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?