Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Mattox v. Owens et al
as 6:2013cv00538
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Mattox
Defendant:
Jerome Owens, Tommy Adams, Misty Weeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattox v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2013cv00537
Petitioner:
Michael Allen Mattox
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mattox v. Owens et al
as 1:2013cv00487
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Mattox
Defendant:
Jerome Owens, Tommy Adams, Misty Weeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattox v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2013cv00461
Petitioner:
Michael Allen Mattox
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mattox v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2013cv00189
Petitioner:
Michael Allen Mattox
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mattox v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2013cv00293
Petitioner:
Michael Allen Mattox
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valencia v. Livingston
as 9:2013cv00043
Plaintiff:
Ysidro Valencia
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Gary . Hunter, Wayne Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mattox v. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv05254
Plaintiff:
Dora Mattox
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hawthorne v. Espino et al
as 9:2012cv00070
Plaintiff:
Barron L Hawthorne
Defendant:
Valentino Espino, Jonathan D Reynolds, Aaron P Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 3:2012cv00031
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America, Josue Noyles, Tom Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
