Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Castro v. Feliciano
as 20-1744
Defendant:
Warden Maureen P. Baird, Metropolitan Correctional Center, New York, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Correctional Officer Alvaro Riano, William Feliciano and United States of America
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Castro
Castro v. Feliciano
as 19-2496
Defendant:
Warden Maureen P. Baird, Metropolitan Correctional Center, New York, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Correctional Officer Alvaro Riano, William Feliciano and United States of America
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Castro
HALL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv02063
Defendant:
BRIAN D. KARTH, MAUREEN P. BAIRD, SARA M. REVELL and others
Plaintiff:
GORDON LEROY HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
WARREN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv01329
Plaintiff:
JACK WADE WARREN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LORETTA E. LYNCH, JEFF SESSIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Benjamin Johnson v. Maureen Baird
as 17-1657
Petitioner - Appellant:
BENJAMIN A. JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
MAUREEN P. BAIRD
Masoud Bamdad v. Maureen P. Baird, et al
as 17-1609
Petitioner - Appellant:
MASOUD BAMDAD
Respondent - Appellee:
MAUREEN P. BAIRD, Warden and JEFF SESSIONS, Attorney General of the United States
Matthew Schorr v. Jeffrey Walton, et al
as 16-3409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW P. SCHORR
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY S. WALTON and MAUREEN P. BAIRD, Warden
Parker v. Baird
as 3:2016cv01012
Petitioner:
Tracy L Parker
Respondent:
Maureen P. Baird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hamrick v. Baird
as 3:2016cv00967
Plaintiff:
Rodney C Hamrick
Defendant:
Maureen P. Baird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Borowski v. Baird et al
as 3:2016cv00848
Plaintiff:
Matthew Paul Borowski
Defendant:
Maureen P. Baird, Sara M Revell and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
