Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Seymore v. Fletcher
as 13-1414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Maurice Seymore
Defendant - Appellee:
Mr. Fletcher, Mental Health Doctor, Mr. Means, Mental Health Supervisor, George Motchan Detention Center, Mental Health Department and others
Seymore v. Chief Doctor John or Jane Doe et al
as 1:2012cv08879
Plaintiff:
Maurice Seymore
Defendant:
Chief Doctor John or Jane Doe, Nurse John or Jane Doe, Doctor John & Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seymore v. Chief Doctor John or Jane Doe et al
as 7:2012cv08879
Plaintiff:
Maurice Seymore
Defendant:
Chief Doctor John or Jane Doe, Nurse John or Jane Doe, Doctor John & Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seymore v. New York CIty et al
as 7:2012cv07117
Plaintiff:
Maurice Seymore
Defendant:
New York CIty, New York Dept. Ciiy Correction Services, Jane Doe-A and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seymore v. New York CIty et al
as 1:2012cv07117
Plaintiff:
Maurice Seymore
Defendant:
New York CIty, New York Dept. Ciiy Correction Services, Jane Doe-A and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seymore v. The City of New York, et al.,
as 1:2012cv06870
Plaintiff:
Maurice Seymore
Defendant:
The City Of New York City and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seymore v. The People of the State of New York
as 1:2011cv04197
Petitioner:
Maurice Seymore
Respondent:
The People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Seymore v. Department of Corr. Services et al
as 1:2011cv02254
Plaintiff:
Maurice Seymore
Defendant:
Department of Corr. Services, Maintenance Dept. Commissioner, Dora Schirrs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seymore v. Fletcher et al
as 1:2011cv01801
Plaintiff:
Maurice Seymore
Defendant:
Fletcher, Means, Mental Health Department at GMDC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
