Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Harbor Pipe and Steel, Inc. v. USDC-CARIV
as 23-70073
Not Classified By Court:
In re: HARBOR PIPE AND STEEL, INC. and MAZAK OPTONICS CORPORATION
Petitioner:
HARBOR PIPE AND STEEL, INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
Harbor Pipe and Steel Inc v. Mazak Optonics Corporation
as 1:2023cv02085
Plaintiff:
Harbor Pipe and Steel Inc
Defendant:
Mazak Optonics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harbor Pipe and Steel Inc v. Mazak Optonics Corporation
as 5:2022cv01775
Plaintiff:
Harbor Pipe & Steel Inc and Harbor Pipe and Steel Inc
Petitioner:
Mazak Optonics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Boise Mobile Equipment, Inc. v. Mazak Optonics Corporation
as 1:2021cv00200
Plaintiff:
Boise Mobile Equipment, Inc.
Defendant:
Mazak Optonics Corporation and Gladwin Machinery and Supply Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boise Mobile Equipment, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00199
Plaintiff:
MAZAK OPTONICS CORPORATION and Boise Mobile Equipment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mazak Optonics Corporation v. MG Laser, Inc.
as 17-2669
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MAZAK OPTONICS CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellant:
MG LASER, INC.
Mazak Optonics Corporation v. Marlette
as 1:2017cv01023
Plaintiff:
Mazak Optonics Corporation
Defendant:
Doug Marlette
Intervenor_defendant:
MG Laser, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mazak Optonics Corporation v. L & W Fab & Machine, Inc.
as 1:2014cv02078
Plaintiff:
Mazak Optonics Corporation
Defendant:
L & W Fab & Machine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vongphakdy v. Mazak Optonics Corporation
as 1:2010cv05819
Plaintiff:
Khammy Vongphakdy
Defendant:
Mazak Optonics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
