Cases 21 - 30 of 90
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07454
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brightly v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 3:2019cv01642
Defendant:
McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC, Shawn Wooden, Jennifer Jason and others
Plaintiff:
Winston Brightly
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv81186
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Berg et al v. McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC
as 1:2019cv05113
Defendant:
McCalla Raymer Liebert Pierce, LLC and McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC
Plaintiff:
Lois I. Berg and Robert D. Berg
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Loughran et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2019cv04023
Defendant:
McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC, Mayer Brown LLP, Pierce & Associates P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Loughran and Margaret Loughran
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Watson v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 19-1113
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc., Kevin Dubay, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant / Appellee:
McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Watson
Meyer v. Fay Servicing, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00088
Defendant:
Fay Servicing, LLC and McCalla, Raymer, Leibert, Pierce, LLC
Plaintiff:
Paul Meyer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
TYREE v. DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC et al
as 1:2019mc00015
Respondent:
DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC, MCCALLA RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE, LLC, SHELL POINT MORTGAGE SERVICING and others
Petitioner:
RUTHA TYREE
TYREE v. DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC et al
as 1:2019mc00014
Respondent:
DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC, MCCALLA RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE, LLC, SHELL POINT MORTGAGE SERVICING and others
Petitioner:
RUTHA TYREE
Petrikas et al v. Ditech Financial, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00085
Defendant:
McCalla, Raymer, Leibert, Pierce, LLC and Ditech Financial, LLC
Plaintiff:
Daina Petrikiene and Gintautas Petrikas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
