Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Cunningham v. Cobb County, Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv01349
Plaintiff:
Jamie Cunningham
Defendant:
Cobb County, Georgia, Evan McDonald, Christopher Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Postell v. Gardner et al
as 1:2021cv05011
Plaintiff:
Crandall O. Postell
Defendant:
Leslie Abrams Gardner, American Civil Liberties Union of Georgia, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollins v. Gwinnett County, Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv03756
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Hollins
Defendant:
Michael Bongiovanni, Robert McDonald, Gwinnett County, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
MCDONALD v. BAINBRIDGE GEORGIA et al
as 1:2021cv00027
Plaintiff:
JAMES GREGORY MCDONALD
Defendant:
BAINBRIDGE GEORGIA, CHIP WILLIAM NIX, CITY OF BAINBRIDGE GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv00001
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04650
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MCDONALD v. CITY OF BAINBRIDGE GEORGIA et al
as 1:2020cv00028
Defendant:
CHIP WILLIAM NIX, CITY OF BAINBRIDGE GEORGIA and CHIP NIX
Plaintiff:
JAMES GREGORY MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
