Cases 1 - 10 of 345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00448
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pinkston v. Brown et al
as 1:2023cv04868
Plaintiff:
Jabarr Desmond Pinkston
Defendant:
Jeffrey L Foster and McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prater v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Randall T. Prater
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Walter A. McNeil, Harry K. Singletary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammond v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv04629
Defendant:
Henry County Magistrate Court, Henry County District Attorney, The State of Georgia and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dennis Hammond, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv03105
Defendant:
City of McDonough Police Department, Brian Amero, District Attorney Tommy K. Floyd and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dennis Hammond, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronnie McGee v. Attorney General, State of Fl, et al
as 16-17392
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONNIE LEE MCGEE
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES R. MCDONOUGH and BILL MCCOLLUM
Michael Ruffin v. James McDonough
as 16-17012
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL RUFFIN
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES R. MCDONOUGH
Gary Wheeler v. Michael Moore, et al
as 16-16070
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY LEE WHEELER
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MOORE, ROBERT A. BUTTERWORTH and MCDONOUGH
Cottam v. City of Wildwood et al
as 8:2016cv01529
Plaintiff:
John Cottam
Defendant:
City of Wildwood, City of Wildwood Police Dept., Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobby Lawrence v. James McDonough, et al
as 15-10731
Petitioner - Appellant:
BOBBY LEE LAWRENCE
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES MCDONOUGH and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
