Cases 11 - 20 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DIDONATO v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 1:2023cv02566
Plaintiff:
SCOTT CARL DIDONATO
Defendant:
DENIS R. MCDONOUGH and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
NOBLE v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. NOBLE
Defendant:
SCOTT HARRIS, CARINA LAGUZZI, DENNIS MCDONOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEBB v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 1:2023cv01344
Plaintiff:
MIKE WEBB MAJOR doing business as MAJOR MIKE WEBB FOR VA also known as FRIENDS FOR MIKE WEBB doing business as MAJOR MIKE WEBB FOR CONGRESS and FRIENDS FOR MIKE WEBB
Defendant:
DENIS RICHARD MCDONOUGH and DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
WEST v. MCDONOUGH
as 1:2023cv01268
Plaintiff:
LEO WEST
Defendant:
DENIS R. MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JACKSON v. MCDONOUGH
as 1:2023cv01024
Plaintiff:
EVA VIRGINIA JACKSON
Defendant:
DENIS R. MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
