Cases 1 - 10 of 20
McFadden v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
Sara A McFadden
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McFadden v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00235
Plaintiff:
Johnny Dan McFadden, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lollis et al v. All Superior Courts of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2015cv00586
Plaintiff:
Fred Lollis and Rosemary Lollis
Defendant:
All Superior Courts of Oklahoma, County of Tulsa, Tulsa County DHS-CPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lollis et al v. Felty et al
as 4:2015cv00588
Plaintiff:
Fred Lollis and Rosemary Lollis
Defendant:
Kyle Felty, Brandy O'Brian, Brandy Laird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFadden v. Tulsa County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 4:2015cv00348
Plaintiff:
Vanessa McFadden
Defendant:
Tulsa County Board of County Commissioners , Stanley Glanz , Tim Albin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wolfe v. Gray et al
as 4:2013cv00286
Plaintiff:
Betty Wolfe
Defendant:
J J Gray, Brandon McFadden and City of Tulsa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McFadden v. Midwest City City of
as 5:2012cv01419
Plaintiff:
Kelley J McFadden
Defendant:
Midwest City City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pointer v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2012cv00397
Plaintiff:
Lindell Pointer
Defendant:
City of Tulsa , Jeff Henderson, Brandon McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFadden v. Arch Insurance Company
as 6:2012cv00208
Plaintiff:
Mark Kendall McFadden
Defendant:
Arch Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mata et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Mata, Jr and JAM
Defendant:
United States of America, City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Brandon McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
