Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00402
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zare v. Ideanomics, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00608
Defendant:
James S. Cassano, Harry Edelson, Jerry Fan and others
Nominal Defendant:
Ideanomics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alireza Zare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McMahon v. Russell et al
as 3:2020cv00453
Petitioner:
Johnny Edward McMahon
Respondent:
Perry Russell, State of Nevada and Nevada, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00430
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Linda McMahon, et al.
as 3:2018cv00297
Defendant:
Linda McMahon and Nevada State Development Corp.
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Colpo Caldo LLC v. Ronald Trunk et al
as 3:2018cv00289
Plaintiff:
Colpo Caldo LLC
Defendant:
Lynn McMahon, Ryan O'Callaghan, Ronald Trunk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00238
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McMahon v. Baca et al
as 3:2018cv00002
Respondent:
Isidro Baca, Nevada Attorney General and Nevada, State of
Petitioner:
Johnny Edward McMahon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMahon v. The Howard Hughes Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv02418
Defendant:
Chico's FAS, Inc. and Howard Hughes Corporation
Plaintiff:
Diane McMahon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Banks et al v. New York Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv00151
Defendant:
Ronnie Abrams, Jessica Albert, Harold Baer and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Kenneth Posner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
