Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Addis et al v. McQueen et al
as 1:2022cv00743
Plaintiff:
Jonah Burton Addis, Burton Addis Trust and Yunis Adon El Trust
Defendant:
Deauna McQueen, Wellon Robert G. Attorney and Counselor at Law doing business as Robert G Wellon, Glanville Ural Dexter Fulton County Superior Court doing business as Judge Ural Glanville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Castillo v. Harmon et al
as 1:2020cv04380
Defendant:
L. Adeniyi, J. Moore, M. Nwude and others
Plaintiff:
Jaime Yruegas Castillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 3:2018cv00064
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LAMAR WHITE, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, WALTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, ALCOVY JUDICIAL CIRCUIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLEY v. NOLLEY et al
as 3:2018cv00030
Plaintiff:
DAVID CHRIS KELLEY
Defendant:
KEVIN NOLLEY, DAVID STAUFFACHER, SCOTT BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen v. USA
as 4:2016cv00223
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
John Gregory McQueen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MCQUEEN et al v. SMITH et al
as 3:2015cv00105
Plaintiff:
JAMES MCQUEEN, ORLANDIS M BAUGH, LARRY HITCHCOCK and others
Defendant:
MIKE SMITH, HAILOR, HUFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen et al v. Refuge Family Care PCH, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02154
Plaintiff:
Eric McQueen and Sedrick Neloms
Defendant:
Refuge Family Care PCH, Inc., Miles A. Raynor, Sharon R. Raynor and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
McQueen v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv01759
Plaintiff:
Chad McQueen
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01286
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
