Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Barrios et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv02987
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Barrios, Ronald Coy, Richard Dewitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
McRae v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Mathew Leo McRae
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv09671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Matias et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv01736
Plaintiff:
Jorge Palma, Hope Cofield-Brooks, Belinda Alleyne-Norville and others
Defendant:
City of New York and The New York City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McRae v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv00249
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Michael E. McRae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mcrae v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01644
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Mathew Mcrae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Reddy v. Abitbol et al
as 5:2019cv01493
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Gilles R. R. Abitbol, Esq., Bond, Shoeneck & King, PLLC and others
Plaintiff:
Deepika Reddy
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Reddy v. Abitbol et al
as 1:2019cv09509
Respondent:
Corporation Y, DOES 1-10, Gilles R. R. Abitbol, Esq. and others
Petitioner:
Deepika Reddy
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv10194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
