Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Murphy v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole et al
as 2:2011cv04027
Plaintiff:
Michael Dunham Murphy
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, Ellis McSwain, Chuck Prior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Prudden
as 2:2010cv00081
Plaintiff:
Ronald Williams
Defendant:
Douglas J. Prudden, Ellis McSwain, Jr, Jay Nixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kemper v. McSwain et al
as 2:2010cv04204
Plaintiff:
Benedict Kemper
Defendant:
Ellis McSwain, Penny Hubbard, Reid Forrester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. McSwain et al
as 2:2010cv04146
Plaintiff:
Jim Harris, Jr
Defendant:
Ellis McSwain and Mo. Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Chairman and Members of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole
as 4:2010cv00104
Plaintiff:
Arbary Phillip Jackson
Defendant:
Ellis McSwain, Jr and Emily Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cannon v. Crawford et al
as 2:2009cv04226
Plaintiff:
Percy C. Cannon
Defendant:
Larry Crawford, Steven Long, Ellis McSwain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lantrip v. McSwain
as 4:2009cv01662
Petitioner:
Thomas Nelson Lantrip, III
Respondent:
Ellis McSwain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McBride v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv04180
Plaintiff:
Darrin McBride
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, George Lombardi and Ellis McSwain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simmons v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 4:2009cv00449
Petitioner:
Alfred J Simmons
Respondent:
Missouri Board of Probation and Parole and Ellis McSwain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. McSwain
as 4:2009cv00146
Petitioner:
Jim Harris, Jr
Respondent:
Ellis McSwain
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
