Cases 1 - 9 of 9
KAMDEN-OUAFFO v. SPATARO et al
as 1:2022cv03285
Plaintiff:
RICKY KAMDEN-OUAFFO
Defendant:
AMBER M. SPATARO, BERNARD JACQUES, DANIELLE M. DWYER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DOE v. MCELROY et al
as 2:2021cv17956
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
LARRICK MCELROY, DEVOUGHN MOORE, GUSTAVO FRANCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWMAN et al v. MOUNT LAUREL POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv05152
Plaintiff:
VANCE BOWMAN and SOL DIAZ
Defendant:
MOUNT LAUREL POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER C MCELROY, TROOPER RINALDI BADGE NO. 7063 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv13119
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KAMDEM-OUAFFO v. CAMPBELL'S SOUP COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv00298
Plaintiff:
RICKY KAMDEM-OUAFFO
Defendant:
CAMPBELL'S SOUP COMPANY , TASK MANAGEMENT INC. , DENISE M. MORRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REAVES v. MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2016cv03127
Plaintiff:
JACQUELYN REAVES
Defendant:
MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, MCELROY, MULVANEY, DEUTSCH & CARPENTER, LLP, MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HEINE et al v. HOLAHAN et al
as 2:2013cv07251
Plaintiff:
ELLEN HEINE, RUTHANN HUGHES and RICHARD HOLLER
Defendant:
FRANK HOLAHAN, McELROY, DEUTSCH, MULVANEY & CARPENTER, LLP, BETSY RAMOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER TAYLOR HALLETT et al v. NEW JERSEY STATE et al
as 3:2009cv03704
Plaintiff:
AUDREY CARTER TAYLOR HALLETT, DRAYTON CARTER, ADRIENNE TAYLOR CRAWFORD and others
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE, MERCER COUNTY PROBATION, ANN MILGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
