Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Means v. Lyft, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Tabatha Means
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Means v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2023cv03509
Plaintiff:
Ira Means
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Means v. Monsanto Company Inc
as 3:2022cv09142
Plaintiff:
Ira Means
Defendant:
Monsanto Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Means v. Monsanto Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv09037
Plaintiff:
Ira Means
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2022cv05059
Plaintiff:
Morganne Mease, Trenashia Jones, Rayna Moses and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jennifer Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05056
Plaintiff:
Nona Greeley, Jennifer Adams, Michaella Adkins and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Samantha Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04956
Plaintiff:
Samantha Jones, Angela Kelley, James Kern and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
(PS) Morgan v. County of San Joaquin et al
as 2:2021cv00427
Defendant:
Christopher Holden, Craig Means and County of San Joaquin
Plaintiff:
Wiendi Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Testa v. Yuri Prokopenko et al
as 2:2020cv01457
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, 13th Titan and Yuri Prokopenko
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Testa and Jonathan Testa individually and doing business as Mean Folk, LLC, a Vermont limited liability company
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv08336
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
