Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Meares v. Lubbock Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Meares
Defendant:
Lubbock Police Department, Sean House and Angelica Blanco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meares v. Rowe
as 5:2023cv00297
Petitioner:
Michael Meares
Respondent:
Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Meares v. Rowe, et al
as 5:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Meares
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, Lubbock County Detention Center and Charles Blevins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meares v. Rowe
as 5:2023cv00197
Petitioner:
Michael Aaron Meares
Respondent:
Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Charpentier v. Mears Group Inc
as 3:2020cv02004
Defendant:
Mears Group, Inc. and Mears Group Inc
Plaintiff:
Jared Charpentier
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
State Of Texas et al v. Rising Eagle Capital Group LLC et al
as 4:2020cv02021
Plaintiff:
State of Arkansas, State of North Carolina, State Of Texas and others
Defendant:
John C Spiller, II, JSQUARED TELECOM LLC, Jakob A Mears and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Irwin v. Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv01757
Plaintiff:
Justin Wayne Irwin
Defendant:
Martin Linley Mears, Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc., d/b/a Pep Boys and Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc. doing business as Pep Boys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mears v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 5:2020cv00070
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Brookie Mears
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mears Group, Inc. v. O'Donnell, Jr.
as 4:2020cv00656
Plaintiff:
Mears Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Joseph P. O'Donnell, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
