Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kaul et al v. Intercontinental Exchange et al
as 1:2023cv02016
Plaintiff:
M.D. Richard Arjun Kaul, David Basch and Jane Doe
Defendant:
John Doe, Intercontinental Exchange, GEICO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davis v. Davis et al
as 2:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Jordan P. Davis and Jordan Patrick Davis
Defendant:
Antonia Navarro Davis, Barre Town Police Department, Berlin Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mir v. Zucker
as 20-1659
Defendant / Appellee:
Gary Gitnick, In Individual; Personal and Official Capacity, Joshua A. Bardin, In Individual, Personal, Capacity, Marian Goldstein, In Personal and Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jehan Zeb Mir
Buckley v. Medical Board & Psychiatirst o
as 17-4002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michelle Elaine Buckley
Defendant - Appellee:
Medical Board & Psychiatirst of Respective States
Buckley v. Medical Board & Psychiatirst of Respective States
as 1:2017cv08450
Plaintiff:
Michelle Elaine Buckley
Defendant:
Medical Board & Psychiatirst of Respective States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv08016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Porter v. Vermont State Medical Board et al
as 2:2014cv00270
Plaintiff:
Christine Porter
Defendant:
Vermont State Medical Board and Wisconsin State Medical Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv04718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
