Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Timmons v. AngioDynamics, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Rosa Timmons
Defendant:
AngioDynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Boyer v. AngioDynamics, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv01179
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Boyer
Defendant:
AngioDynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Reed v. Angiodynamics, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04066
Plaintiff:
Tammy Reed
Defendant:
Angiodynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dinwiddie v. Cook Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00882
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER L. DINWIDDIE
Defendant:
Cook Group, Inc., COOK MED INSTITUTE, INC., MED INSTITUTE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castaneda v. Saint Francis Medical Center et al
as 1:2020cv00262
Plaintiff:
Renee Castaneda
Defendant:
Cape Girardeau Surgical Clinic, Inc, Dr. Ronald Richmond, M.D., Saint Francis Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Castaneda v. Saint Francis Medical Center et al
as 4:2020cv01714
Plaintiff:
Renee Castaneda
Defendant:
Cape Girardeau Surgical Clinic, Inc, Dr. Ronald Richmond, M.D., Saint Francis Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Stout v. Cook Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv01439
Defendant:
Cook Denmark Holding APS, Cook Medical, Inc. a/k/a Cook Medical, Inc, Cook Medical, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Judy Stout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REHAB MEDICAL INC. v. GIERER
as 2:2018cv04208
Defendant:
JENNIFER GIERER
Plaintiff:
REHAB MEDICAL INC.
Rehab Medical Inc. v. Jennifer Gierer
as 2:2018mc04208
Defendant:
Jennifer Gierer
Plaintiff:
Rehab Medical Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
