Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Medina Rodriguez v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11539
Defendant:
Equifax Information Services, LLC and Birchwood Credit Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jamie Medina Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Medina v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv10893
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc., Fresenius USA Sales, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Medina
as 1:2017mc91306
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Evelyn Medina
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Medina et al v. Sun Products Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv11675
Plaintiff:
Rosalynd Medina and Jimmy Medina
Defendant:
Sun Products Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: DAILY FANTASY SPORTS LITIGATION
as 1:2016md02677
Defendant:
DAILY FANTASY SPORTS LITIGATION, MATTHEW BOCCIO, FANDUEL DEPOSITS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Cory Hemrich, Kelly Griffin, Steven Brown and others
Amicus Curiae:
Aaron Rivera, Glenn Pena and Joseph Leckerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Gillette Company v. Medina et al
as 1:2016cv10018
Plaintiff:
The Gillette Company
Defendant:
Eduardo Medina, Marcia Medina, Jacqueline Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Puerta v United States of America
as 1:2015cv14257
Petitioner:
Antonio Medina Puerta
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Medina et al v. DRAFTKINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv13807
Plaintiff:
Karl Medina and Stephan Fernandez
Defendant:
DRAFTKINGS, INC. and FANDUEL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Medina
as 4:2015mc94028
Defendant:
Alehandros Medina
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Medina v. Baystate Health Systems
as 3:2015cv30138
Plaintiff:
Luz Medina
Defendant:
Baystate Health Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
