Cases 41 - 50 of 563
Medina Abrego, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1094
Petitioner:
WILLIAM EDGARDO MEDINA ABREGO and WILLIAM ANTONIO MEDINA REYES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Miguel Cruz-Medina
as 22-10144
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MIGUEL CRUZ-MEDINA, AKA Miguel Cruz
Castro Torres v. Southwest Auto Sales and Finance LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00960
Plaintiff:
Odalis D Castro Torres
Defendant:
Southwest Auto Sales and Finance LLC, Geronimo Mata Robles, Jose G Lopez Verdin and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32710 Federal Odometer Act
Valenzuela-Medina v. Garland
as 22-956
Petitioner:
RAMON VALENZUELA-MEDINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Angello Medina
as 22-50119
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANGELLO STEVEN MEDINA
USA v. Jose Cruz-Delgado
as 22-30084
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE LUIS CRUZ-DELGADO, AKA Salvador Rosas-Medina
Medina Gomez v. Garland
as 22-862
Petitioner:
JOSE GUADALUPE MEDINA GOMEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Aguilar Medina v. Garland
as 22-842
Petitioner:
ISMAEL AGUILAR MEDINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Brews & Brats, Inc et al
as 3:2022cv02714
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Brews & Brats, Inc an unknown business entity d/b/a Brews & Brats, Omni Group Financial, Inc. an unknown business entity d/b/a Brews & Brats, Veronica Romero individually and d/b/a Brews & Brats and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
City of Ojai v. United States Forest Service et al
as 2:2022cv02800
Plaintiff:
City of Ojai
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, Karina Medina, Tom Vilsack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
