Cases 41 - 50 of 460
Cavazos v. Garilaso et al
as 3:2021cv04330
Plaintiff:
Robert Cavazos
Defendant:
Mr. Garilaso, Mr. Trejo, Mr. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huynh v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) et al
as 3:2021cv04039
Defendant:
P. Sullivan, B. Avina, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) and others
Plaintiff:
Tri Huu Huynh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael R. Spengler v. Infante et al
as 2:2021cv02362
Defendant:
Deputy Lua, Deputy Palaguelos, Deputy Song and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Spengler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2021cv00305
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, L Kaiser and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael R. Spengler v. Deputy Lua et al
as 2:2021cv01161
Defendant:
Deputy Lua, Deputy Palaguelos, Deputy Song and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Spengler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pedro Medina Castillon v. The People of the State of California et al
as 3:2021cv00973
Petitioner:
Pedro Medina Castillon
Respondent:
The People of the State of California and Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Hammler v. Allison et al
as 1:2021cv00122
Defendant:
T. Sanders, Ralph Diaz, D. Nava and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Bell v. CDCR et al
as 1:2021cv00121
Defendant:
S. Sherman, P. Brightwell, R. Medina and others
Plaintiff:
Leonte Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Bell v. CDCR et al
as 2:2021cv00138
Defendant:
S. Sherman, P. Brightwell, R. Medina and others
Plaintiff:
Leonte Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Dupree v. Moreno et al
as 2:2021cv00106
Defendant:
E. Moreno, N. Vera, Ceballos and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Jose Dupree, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
