Cases 1 - 10 of 119
Medina v. Griffis et al
as 7:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Joe A. Medina
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike Griffs, Commissinor Michael Gardner, Captain FNU McKinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Hirsch et al
as 6:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Jose A Medina
Defendant:
Billy Hirsch, Senior Warden Jimmy Bowman, Lisa Mcclain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00796
Petitioner:
Ernesto Medina
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02041
Petitioner:
Ernesto Medina
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vizcayno v. Medina et al
as 7:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Guadalupe Vizcayno
Defendant:
Sgt. Lydia Long Medina and Sgt. Arnie R. Juala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00334
Petitioner:
Willie Medina and Guillermo Flores Medina
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2022cv01315
Plaintiff:
Jesus Medina
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Garcia et al
as 6:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Juan Garcia, John R. Delapp, Jr., Michael O. McNeil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03185
Petitioner:
Angel Medina
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00777
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
