Torts - Injury Cases filed in West Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Coe v. Welling
as 1:2023cv00031
Plaintiff: Megan Lynn Coe
Defendant: Mark Edward Welling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Cooper v. 7-Eleven, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00553
Plaintiff: Trinta Cooper and Trinita Cooper
Defendant: 7-Eleven, Inc. and doing business as 7-Eleven and Megan Lanham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCarthy v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00967
Plaintiff: Megan McCarthy
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wildblood-Crawford et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv16215
Plaintiff: Megan N. Wildblood-Crawford and Bruce Wildblood-Crawford
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bramble v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14181
Plaintiff: Megan Elizabeth Bramble
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steinbach v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv11655
Plaintiff: Megan Steinbach
Defendant: Cook Incorporated, Cook Biotech, Inc. and Cook Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Breniser et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv08022
Plaintiff: Megan Breniser and William R. Woods
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swearingen v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00392
Plaintiff: Megan Swearingen
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Balaban v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00153
Plaintiff: Megan Elayne Balaban
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Agnew v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv29649
Plaintiff: Megan Agnew
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?