Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Fry v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Fry
Defendant:
Judge Megan Adams, A.G. James Betts, John Edinger, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Rover Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Michael Harrison
Defendant:
Rover Group, Inc., Aaron Easterly, Megan Quinn Siegler and others
Price v. Rover Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Michael Price
Defendant:
Rover Group, Inc., Aaron Easterly, Megan Quinn Siegler and others
Saunders v. Vitalcare Health Strategies, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Robert Saunders
Defendant:
Vitalcare Health Strategies, LLC, Chardonnay Dialysis, Inc., Dr. Aweke Aduku-Ezeh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Zhang v. Brian et al
as 1:2022cv01577
Plaintiff:
Yimao Zhang
Defendant:
Henry Brian, Megan Miller and Judge Rae M. Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thomas v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv01081
Plaintiff:
Megan Thomas
Defendant:
Chief Thomas A. Johnson and City of Dover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Huang v. Timm et al
as 1:2022cv00865
Plaintiff:
Tongbo Huang
Defendant:
Alexander Timm, Daniel Rosenthal, Jerri DeVard and others
Nominal Defendant:
Root, Inc.
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
Christina Adams, Peter Eldridge, Jonathan Fessenden and others
Defendant:
Michael Brewer and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
