Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hall et al v. Florida Home-Improvement Associates, Inc. et al
as 0:2015cv62151
Plaintiff:
Romain Fitzroy Hall and Michael Hayes
Defendant:
Florida Home-Improvement Associates, Inc. and Mel Feinberg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Prado v. Mel Ott Insurance Agency, Inc.
as 6:2015cv01474
Plaintiff:
Jose Prado
Defendant:
Mel Ott Insurance Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
CARR v. CITY OF PORT ST JOE FLORIDA et al
as 5:2013cv00065
Defendant:
CITY OF PORT ST JOE FLORIDA , MEL C MAGIDSON, JR , DAVID GARNER and others
Plaintiff:
LYNNE CARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mel Laurn Properties, Inc. et al v. Hancock Bank et al
as 6:2012cv00912
Plaintiff:
Mel Laurn Properties, Inc., Felix Labban and Sool Labban
Defendant:
Hancock Bank, Jeffry R. Jontz, Orange County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Berlanga et al v. Berlanga et al
as 3:2012cv00402
Plaintiff:
Pablo Berlanga and Phyllis Berlanga
Defendant:
Florinda Berlanga, Arturo Berlanga, Connie Berlanga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock Bank v. Mel Laurn Properties, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv01997
Plaintiff:
Hancock Bank
Defendant:
Mel Laurn Properties, Inc. , Sool Labban and Felix Labban
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mathis v. Bessinger et al
as 3:2010cv01190
Plaintiff:
Willie N. Mathis
Defendant:
Mel Bessinger, Ralph Yazdiya, Mike Lagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
