Cases 71 - 80 of 91
Petersen v. Mel S. Harris & Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv04385
Plaintiff:
Jeval Petersen
Defendant:
Mel S. Harris & Associates, LLC and Rushmore Recoveries X LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sykes v. Mel S. Harris and Associates LLC et al
as 1:2009cv08486
Plaintiff:
Monique Sykes
Defendant:
Mel S. Harris and Associates LLC, Mel S. Harris, Michael Young and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv61486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv07680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
White v. Mel S. Harris Associates et al
as 6:2009cv06369
Plaintiff:
Willie E. White
Defendant:
Mel S. Harris Associates and Pin Point Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv06218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Willner v. Mel S. Harris and Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00964
Plaintiff:
Nicole Willner
Defendant:
Mel S. Harris and Associates, LLC and Mel S. Harris
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BAYLIS v. WACHOVIA BANK, N.A. et al
as 5:2008cv03392
Plaintiff:
DIANNE BAYLIS
Defendant:
WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., MEL S. HARRIS, MEL S. HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv06310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
