Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Barber v. AFAM Concept, Inc. d//b/a JF Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10354
Plaintiff:
Melisa Barber
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d//b/a JF Labs, Inc., Avlon Industries, Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bell-Churchwell v. Spirit Airlines, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
MeLisa Bell-Churchwell
Defendant:
Spirit Airlines, Inc. and TOTAL AIRPORT SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Ruiz v. Strow et al
as 4:2020cv04267
Defendant:
Adkison Hilgendorf, Jane/Jon Doe, Shellie A and others
Plaintiff:
Israel Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06931
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06749
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ruiz v. Francis, Jr. et al
as 3:2020cv50429
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, Adkison Hilgendorf, Shellie A. and others
Plaintiff:
Israel Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anemone et al v. Interstate Management Company, LLC
as 1:2019cv03205
Plaintiff:
Divine Igiraneza, Maria Ruiz, Maria de San Juan Cajigas and others
Defendant:
Does 1-3 and Interstate Management Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ruiz v. Francis et al
as 4:2019cv04005
Defendant:
Adkison Hilgendorf, Jane Doe, John Frost and others
Plaintiff:
Israel Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coyle v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv50270
Defendant:
Ms Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Melisa Coyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Davenport v. Advocate Christ Medical Center et al
as 3:2016cv50256
Plaintiff:
Melisa J. Davenport
Defendant:
Advocate Christ Medical Center, Advocate Home Health Services, Thoratec Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
