Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Mell v. Thompson
as 1:2023cv00098
Petitioner:
Steven Bradley Mell
Respondent:
R. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GRECO et al v. Chinese Communist Party
as 2:2020cv02235
Defendant:
Chinese Communist Party and PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH SPINOSA, JOHN CAIKOWSKI, PATRICIA CARCAREY and others
Lead Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY GRECO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRECO et al v. PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, et al
as 5:2020cv02235
Defendant:
Chinese Communist Party and PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA
Plaintiff:
DON ZAJICK, DEBORAH SPINOSA, JOHN CAIKOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOBETS-ORDONEZ, et al. v. TONI MELLE
as 2:2019cv05207
Defendant:
TONI MELLE
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ORDONEZ OCHOA and NATALIA KOBETS-ORDONEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MELL v. DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC. et al
as 5:2018cv00248
Plaintiff:
ELLEN MELL
Defendant:
DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC. , DARDEN RESTAURANTS OF PA MERGER CORP. and FCPT KEYSTONE PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MELLE et al v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv01946
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MELLE and SUSAN PURTELL
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MELLE v. W.R. GRACE & CO.
as 2:2010cv83920
Plaintiff:
EDWARD R. MELLE and JOSEPH J. MELLE
Defendant:
W.R. GRACE & CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MELLING v. A C & S, INC.
as 2:2010cv84606
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. MELLING
Defendant:
A C & S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MELL et al v. GNC CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv00945
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER MELL and JOSE MUNOZ
Defendant:
GNC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MELL et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv69314
Plaintiff:
HELEN MELL
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES , BAIRNCO CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
