Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Menjivar v. Castro et al
as 0:2024cv01131
Petitioner:
Christian Alberto Mendez Menjivar
Respondent:
Deisy Rosibel Enamorado Castro and Fredis Donain Montoya Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02578
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mendez v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 0:2022cv02754
Plaintiff:
Carmin Mendez
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Johnson v. MCF - Moose Lake et al
as 0:2022cv01915
Plaintiff:
Eugene Laron Johnson
Defendant:
MCF - Moose Lake, Officer J. Mendez and Andy Turnboom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez v. Kallis et al
as 0:2021cv01147
Defendant:
Mr. Woltman, Ms. Hodge, Trust Funds Commissary Sales and others
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. Kallis et al
as 0:2021cv00178
Defendant:
Health Services, Unkowns, Ms. Balas and others
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. FMC Rochester, Minnesota et al
as 0:2020cv01979
Defendant:
FMC Rochester, Minnesota, Warden Steve Kallis, A female Correctional SiS employ and others
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Mendez v. FMC Rochester et al
as 0:2020cv01717
Defendant:
Mr. Beadling, FMC Rochester, Steve Kallis and others
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Mendez v. FMC Rochester et al
as 0:2020cv01640
Defendant:
Doctor Morgan, Dr. Hadaway, T. Asberry and others
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. Hart et al
as 0:2020cv01438
Defendant:
Ubaldo Bocanegra, Shelley Stanton and Dionne Hart
Plaintiff:
Enoc Alcantara Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
