Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hale-El v. Adams County Fire Rescue et al
as 1:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Defendant:
Adams County Fire Rescue, Chris Huttrer, Steven Mendiola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendiola v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv02654
Plaintiff:
Manuel B Mendiola
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul, SSA Noticing and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mendiola v. DaVita Healthcare Partners, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00416
Plaintiff:
Nora Mendiola
Defendant:
Total Renal Care, Inc. and DaVita Healthcare Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Andalib v. JBS USA, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv02118
Defendant:
JBS USA, LLC, Rigo (I) Mendiola, Anthony Rickoff and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Kacem M. Andalib and Kacem M. Andalib
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Thomas et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2018cv01156
Plaintiff:
Kentrail Walker, Bonnie Riner, Catherine Salazar and others
Defendant:
Chemguard, Kidde PLC, INC., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t
Solis et al v. Circle Group, LLC, The et al
as 1:2016cv01329
Plaintiff:
Violeta Solis , Cesar Salazar , Edgar Ceballos and others
Defendant:
Circle Group, LLC, The, LA Drywall, Inc., Javier Martinez Drywall, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Mendiola v. Colvin et al
as 1:2016cv00653
Plaintiff:
Manuel B Mendiola
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
