Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Rankin v. Shapiro et al.
as 1:2023cv01975
Plaintiff:
Clarence Robert Rankin
Defendant:
Josh Shapiro, Xavior Becerra, Kilolo Kijakazi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
AtriCure, Inc. v. Meng et al
as 1:2019cv00054
Defendant:
Dr. Jian Meng, Dr. Guanglu Bai, Larry Meng and others
Plaintiff:
AtriCure, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Digital Media Solutions, LLC v. South University of Ohio, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00145
Defendant:
South University of Ohio, LLC, DCEH Education Holdings, LLC, DC South University of Ohio LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Digital Media Solutions, LLC
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Buncher Company, Stephanie Porreca, Historic Berriman-Morgan, LLC and others
Intervenor:
Benefit Administrative Systems, LLC, Thomas J Perrelli, U.S. Bank, National Association and others
Interested Party:
HEFCO Meadowbrook LLC, Store SPE 1200 Lincoln, LLC, 3601 Sunflower LLC and others
Receiver:
Mark E. Dottore
Petitioner:
Douglas Emmett 2010, llc
Amicus Curiae:
United States
Respondent:
Mark A. Kompa and FSP Pacific Center LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Menge v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2015cv01321
Plaintiff:
Thomas Menge
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Menge v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2011cv00226
Plaintiff:
Thomas Menge
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Meng et al
as 1:2007cv01793
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Lisa Meng and Kurt B. Meng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
