Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Opheim v. Via Christ Ascension Hospital et al
as 2:2020cv02185
Defendant:
Vern Gannon, Trust Company of Manhattan, Meadowlark Hills Retirement Community and others
Plaintiff:
Henrik S. Opheim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
J. S. Haren Company v. Smith & Loveless, Inc. (TV2)
as 2:2019cv02696
Defendant:
Smith & Loveless Inc
Plaintiff:
J. S. Haren Company
Counter Defendant:
Merchants National Bonding, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
United States of America v. Merchant et al
as 5:2017cv04057
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kendra Merchant and Harold R. Haun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Darnell v. Merchant et al
as 5:2017cv03063
Petitioner:
Bobbi Darnell
Respondent:
John Merchant and Kickapoo Tribe in Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TSYS Merchant Solutions, LLC v. Pipeline Productions, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv04024
Plaintiff:
TSYS Merchant Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Pipeline Ticketing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1725
United States of America v. Merchants Capital Partners, L.P.
as 2:2011mc00209
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Merchants Capital Partners, L.P.
Merchant v. RSW Admin, LP et al
as 2:2011cv02045
Plaintiff:
Holly E. Merchant
Defendant:
RSW Admin, LP , RSW Group, LTD and Red Skye Wireless, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Farmers and Merchants Bank of Colby, Kansas v. S&R Holdings, LLC et al
as 5:2010cv04035
Plaintiff:
Farmers and Merchants Bank of Colby, Kansas
Defendant:
S&R Holdings, LLC, Docs on Call, PA, Gary D. Slavens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
